If you consider using this system you must have a vast amount of money and incredible fortitude to march away when you earn a small success. For the benefit of this story, a sample buy in of two thousand dollars is used.
The Horn Bet numbers are surely not seen as the "successful way to play" and the horn bet itself carries a casino edge of over twelve percent.
All you are playing is five dollars on the pass line and ONE number from the horn. It doesn’t matter whether it is a "craps" or "yo" as long as you gamble it routinely. The Yo is more dominant with players using this system for obvious reasons.
Buy in for two thousand dollars when you approach the table however only put $5.00 on the passline and $1 on one of the two, 3, 11, or 12. If it wins, great, if it loses press to $2. If it does not win again, press to four dollars and continue on to eight dollars, then to sixteen dollars and after that add a $1.00 each subsequent wager. Every time you do not win, bet the previous bet plus one more dollar.
Employing this approach, if for instance after fifteen rolls, the number you selected (11) has not been tosses, you surely should march away. Although, this is what possibly could develop.
On the tenth toss, you have a sum of $126 on the table and the YO at long last hits, you gain three hundred and fifteen dollars with a take of one hundred and eighty nine dollars. Now is a good time to walk away as it is higher than what you entered the table with.
If the YO doesn’t hit until the 20th toss, you will have a total wager of $391 and seeing as current wager is at $31, you come away with $465 with your take being $74.
As you can see, adopting this approach with just a $1.00 "press," your gain becomes tinier the longer you play on without succeeding. This is why you have to leave away once you have won or you have to bet a "full press" once more and then advance on with the $1.00 boost with each hand.
Crunch some numbers at home before you attempt this so you are very familiar at when this approach becomes a non-winning proposition instead of a profitable one.